TSTP Solution File: PUZ140^1 by Satallax---3.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : PUZ140^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:26:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 33.24s 33.48s
% Output   : Proof 33.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   36
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  14 unt;   7 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   95 (  26   ~;  11   |;   0   &;  39   @)
%                                         (  12 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   25 (  23 usr;  22 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   4   ^  14   !;   0   ?;  27   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   9  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_syrup,type,
    syrup: $tType ).

thf(ty_beverage,type,
    beverage: $tType ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: beverage ).

thf(ty_heat,type,
    heat: beverage > beverage ).

thf(ty_eigen__3,type,
    eigen__3: beverage ).

thf(ty_coffee,type,
    coffee: beverage ).

thf(ty_hot,type,
    hot: beverage > $o ).

thf(h0,assumption,
    ! [X1: beverage > $o,X2: beverage] :
      ( ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( eps__0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(eigendef_eigen__3,definition,
    ( eigen__3
    = ( eps__0
      @ ^ [X1: beverage] :
          ( ( hot @ X1 )
         != ( hot @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__3])]) ).

thf(h1,assumption,
    ! [X1: syrup > $o,X2: syrup] :
      ( ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( eps__1 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(eigendef_eigen__2,definition,
    ( eigen__2
    = ( eps__1
      @ ^ [X1: syrup] :
          ~ ~ ! [X2: beverage] :
                ( ( ( @+[X3: beverage] : ( hot @ X3 ) )
                  = X2 )
               => ~ ( hot @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__2])]) ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ! [X1: beverage] : ( hot @ ( heat @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ( ( ( @+[X1: beverage] : ( hot @ X1 ) )
        = ( @+[X1: beverage] : ( hot @ X1 ) ) )
     => ~ ( hot
          @ @+[X1: beverage] : ( hot @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ! [X1: beverage] :
        ( ( hot @ X1 )
        = ( hot @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ! [X1: syrup] :
        ~ ! [X2: beverage] :
            ( ( ( @+[X3: beverage] : ( hot @ X3 ) )
              = X2 )
           => ~ ( hot @ X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ( ( @+[X1: beverage] : ( hot @ X1 ) )
      = ( @+[X1: beverage] : ( hot @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(sP6,plain,
    ( sP6
  <=> ! [X1: beverage] :
        ( ( ( @+[X2: beverage] : ( hot @ X2 ) )
          = X1 )
       => ~ ( hot @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).

thf(sP7,plain,
    ( sP7
  <=> ( hot = hot ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).

thf(sP8,plain,
    ( sP8
  <=> ( ( hot @ eigen__3 )
      = ( hot @ eigen__3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).

thf(sP9,plain,
    ( sP9
  <=> ! [X1: beverage > syrup > beverage] :
        ~ ! [X2: syrup] :
            ~ ! [X3: beverage] :
                ( ( ( X1 @ coffee @ X2 )
                  = X3 )
               => ~ ( hot @ X3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).

thf(sP10,plain,
    ( sP10
  <=> ! [X1: beverage] :
        ~ ( hot @ X1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).

thf(sP11,plain,
    ( sP11
  <=> ( hot
      @ @+[X1: beverage] : ( hot @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).

thf(sP12,plain,
    ( sP12
  <=> ( hot @ ( heat @ eigen__0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])]) ).

thf(def_cold_mixture,definition,
    cold_mixture = mix ).

thf(def_hot_mixture,definition,
    ( hot_mixture
    = ( ^ [X1: beverage,X2: syrup] : ( heat @ ( mix @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(hot_coffee,conjecture,
    ~ sP9 ).

thf(h2,negated_conjecture,
    sP9,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hot_coffee]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( ~ sP2
    | ~ sP5
    | ~ sP11 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    sP8,
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( sP3
    | ~ sP8 ),
    inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[h0,eigendef_eigen__3]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( sP7
    | ~ sP3 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( sP5
    | ~ sP7 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ~ sP10
    | ~ sP12 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( sP11
    | sP10 ),
    inference(choice_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ~ sP6
    | sP2 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( sP4
    | sP6 ),
    inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h1])],[h1,eigendef_eigen__2]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ sP9
    | ~ sP4 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ sP1
    | sP12 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(its_hot,axiom,
    sP1 ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,its_hot,h2]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h0]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h1])],[12,h1]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h2]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h0])],[13,h0]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ~ sP9,
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h2])],[12,h2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem  : PUZ140^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 02:33:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 33.24/33.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 33.24/33.48  % Mode: mode448
% 33.24/33.48  % Inferences: 1979
% 33.24/33.48  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------